<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do We Blog For Fame?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/04/11/do-we-blog-for-fame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/04/11/do-we-blog-for-fame/</link>
	<description>Life from the view of a Christian pragmatist and educator.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Biblical Studies Carnival 29 (XXIX) &#171; Dr Jim West</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/04/11/do-we-blog-for-fame/#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>Biblical Studies Carnival 29 (XXIX) &#171; Dr Jim West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 04:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=325#comment-1378</guid>
		<description>[...] Then, take a look at Chris Heard&#8217;s response here. Drew Tatusko has also pitched in with some worthwhile observations here. These posts will speak for themselves and you&#8217;ll know right off why they&#8217;re in first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Then, take a look at Chris Heard&#8217;s response here. Drew Tatusko has also pitched in with some worthwhile observations here. These posts will speak for themselves and you&#8217;ll know right off why they&#8217;re in first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/04/11/do-we-blog-for-fame/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=325#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>That's a good idea Ed!  IT is the same kind of thing that I do with courses I teach.  Start a conversation via blogs at least a couple of days before class.  It allows me to see what people are thinking, what did not make sense, and confirms that people actually read (which is not something you can assume at all).  Then I can actually adjust things in the course session because I will be able to get at specific assumptions and misunderstandings people had before hand.  Makes a really efficient use of time and actually ends up shortening class time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good idea Ed!  IT is the same kind of thing that I do with courses I teach.  Start a conversation via blogs at least a couple of days before class.  It allows me to see what people are thinking, what did not make sense, and confirms that people actually read (which is not something you can assume at all).  Then I can actually adjust things in the course session because I will be able to get at specific assumptions and misunderstandings people had before hand.  Makes a really efficient use of time and actually ends up shortening class time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dtatusko</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/04/11/do-we-blog-for-fame/#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>dtatusko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=325#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>That's a good idea Ed!  IT is the same kind of thing that I do with courses I teach.  Start a conversation via blogs at least a couple of days before class.  It allows me to see what people are thinking, what did not make sense, and confirms that people actually read (which is not something you can assume at all).  Then I can actually adjust things in the course session because I will be able to get at specific assumptions and misunderstandings people had before hand.  Makes a really efficient use of time and actually ends up shortening class time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good idea Ed!  IT is the same kind of thing that I do with courses I teach.  Start a conversation via blogs at least a couple of days before class.  It allows me to see what people are thinking, what did not make sense, and confirms that people actually read (which is not something you can assume at all).  Then I can actually adjust things in the course session because I will be able to get at specific assumptions and misunderstandings people had before hand.  Makes a really efficient use of time and actually ends up shortening class time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revdarth</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/04/11/do-we-blog-for-fame/#comment-1027</link>
		<dc:creator>Revdarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=325#comment-1027</guid>
		<description>I blog sporadically for several reasons.  I started a blog a few years ago when I was working with people in the congregation I serve about my sermons.  A few weeks before preaching, I'd post the scriptural focus and start a conversation on it - it was largely people from around here, but it also brought in people beyond the congregation as well.  I should start doing that again.  

I have started up once again after a long hiatus because its a way I can communicate in a more personal way both with people who keep up with me on facebook and also people (again) in the congregation I serve.  I may not use it just for sermons, but for bringing up other ideas in an "unofficial" manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blog sporadically for several reasons.  I started a blog a few years ago when I was working with people in the congregation I serve about my sermons.  A few weeks before preaching, I&#8217;d post the scriptural focus and start a conversation on it - it was largely people from around here, but it also brought in people beyond the congregation as well.  I should start doing that again.  </p>
<p>I have started up once again after a long hiatus because its a way I can communicate in a more personal way both with people who keep up with me on facebook and also people (again) in the congregation I serve.  I may not use it just for sermons, but for bringing up other ideas in an &#8220;unofficial&#8221; manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revdarth</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/04/11/do-we-blog-for-fame/#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>Revdarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=325#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>I blog sporadically for several reasons.  I started a blog a few years ago when I was working with people in the congregation I serve about my sermons.  A few weeks before preaching, I'd post the scriptural focus and start a conversation on it - it was largely people from around here, but it also brought in people beyond the congregation as well.  I should start doing that again.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have started up once again after a long hiatus because its a way I can communicate in a more personal way both with people who keep up with me on facebook and also people (again) in the congregation I serve.  I may not use it just for sermons, but for bringing up other ideas in an "unofficial" manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blog sporadically for several reasons.  I started a blog a few years ago when I was working with people in the congregation I serve about my sermons.  A few weeks before preaching, I&#8217;d post the scriptural focus and start a conversation on it - it was largely people from around here, but it also brought in people beyond the congregation as well.  I should start doing that again.  </p>
<p>I have started up once again after a long hiatus because its a way I can communicate in a more personal way both with people who keep up with me on facebook and also people (again) in the congregation I serve.  I may not use it just for sermons, but for bringing up other ideas in an &#8220;unofficial&#8221; manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/04/11/do-we-blog-for-fame/#comment-1012</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=325#comment-1012</guid>
		<description>Nick, I know.  And I am guilty as charged there.  I think I have 175 in the feed reader - of course some only post something every blue moon.  But still - it amounts to like 75 that are active.  What gluttons we are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, I know.  And I am guilty as charged there.  I think I have 175 in the feed reader - of course some only post something every blue moon.  But still - it amounts to like 75 that are active.  What gluttons we are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dtatusko</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/04/11/do-we-blog-for-fame/#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>dtatusko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=325#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>Nick, I know.  And I am guilty as charged there.  I think I have 175 in the feed reader - of course some only post something every blue moon.  But still - it amounts to like 75 that are active.  What gluttons we are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, I know.  And I am guilty as charged there.  I think I have 175 in the feed reader - of course some only post something every blue moon.  But still - it amounts to like 75 that are active.  What gluttons we are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honesty and blogging; as long as it doesn&#8217;t become a litmus test &#171; Ben Byerly&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/04/11/do-we-blog-for-fame/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>Honesty and blogging; as long as it doesn&#8217;t become a litmus test &#171; Ben Byerly&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=325#comment-1009</guid>
		<description>[...] discussion on why we blog and how we write when we blog. See other responses here [Chris Heard and Drew – do we blog for fame?]. (Warning: This post breaks both the brevity and succinctness rule.) It’s something I’ve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussion on why we blog and how we write when we blog. See other responses here [Chris Heard and Drew – do we blog for fame?]. (Warning: This post breaks both the brevity and succinctness rule.) It’s something I’ve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Reason I Blog &#171; Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/04/11/do-we-blog-for-fame/#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Reason I Blog &#171; Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=325#comment-1007</guid>
		<description>[...] Real Reason I&#160;Blog    Drew Tatusko asked earlier: &#8220;Do We Blog For Fame?&#8221;  Truth be told, my name already turned up some decent Google hits before I started blogging, but I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Real Reason I&nbsp;Blog    Drew Tatusko asked earlier: &#8220;Do We Blog For Fame?&#8221;  Truth be told, my name already turned up some decent Google hits before I started blogging, but I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Norelli</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/04/11/do-we-blog-for-fame/#comment-1006</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Norelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=325#comment-1006</guid>
		<description>Drew, 

I think that if people only kept tabs on 1 or 2 blogs then long posts wouldn't be so much of a problem, but as it stands, most folks have somewhere between 30-100 blogs in their feed readers.  Those long posts have to be exceptionally captivating in order to keep someone's attention while they still have another couple of dozen blogs to skim through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew, </p>
<p>I think that if people only kept tabs on 1 or 2 blogs then long posts wouldn&#8217;t be so much of a problem, but as it stands, most folks have somewhere between 30-100 blogs in their feed readers.  Those long posts have to be exceptionally captivating in order to keep someone&#8217;s attention while they still have another couple of dozen blogs to skim through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
