<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the emergent cloud must land</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2009/06/04/the-emergent-cloud-must-land/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2009/06/04/the-emergent-cloud-must-land/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:30:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: emergent is not a revolution now because it never was &#8211;</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2009/06/04/the-emergent-cloud-must-land/comment-page-1/#comment-5294</link>
		<dc:creator>emergent is not a revolution now because it never was &#8211;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=2683#comment-5294</guid>
		<description>[...] I do not fault any of this. What I do take issue with are those who are cynical because the revolution apparently &quot;sold out&quot; when there was never a chance for a revolution to happen. The idea never did and never will fit the social circumstances of those who are engaged in the conversation. An alternative community of any kind is not revolutionary, it is simply different. None of this is inherently bad, as long as we are honest about the limits of what this is all about. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I do not fault any of this. What I do take issue with are those who are cynical because the revolution apparently &#34;sold out&#34; when there was never a chance for a revolution to happen. The idea never did and never will fit the social circumstances of those who are engaged in the conversation. An alternative community of any kind is not revolutionary, it is simply different. None of this is inherently bad, as long as we are honest about the limits of what this is all about. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perspective on Emergent &#124; jonathan stegall: creative tension</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2009/06/04/the-emergent-cloud-must-land/comment-page-1/#comment-5293</link>
		<dc:creator>Perspective on Emergent &#124; jonathan stegall: creative tension</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=2683#comment-5293</guid>
		<description>[...] Drew Tatusko - the emergent cloud must land [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Drew Tatusko &#8211; the emergent cloud must land [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disappointed with Emergent?</title>
		<link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2009/06/04/the-emergent-cloud-must-land/comment-page-1/#comment-5291</link>
		<dc:creator>Disappointed with Emergent?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 02:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes-from-offcenter.com/?p=2683#comment-5291</guid>
		<description>[...] say. Others have responded in the comments as well as on blogs (Mike, Jonathan, Makeesha 1 and 2, Drew, Carol, Jonny). And some say that as one of the 24 who met to re-envision Emergent, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] say. Others have responded in the comments as well as on blogs (Mike, Jonathan, Makeesha 1 and 2, Drew, Carol, Jonny). And some say that as one of the 24 who met to re-envision Emergent, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
